Call Now for a Free Consultation: (410) 694-7758
The issue before the court was whether the taxpayer received a taxable, deemed distribution in 2014 from an account that was treated and consistently reported by the Taxpayer as an IRA even though the account entered into a number of prohibited transactions beginning in 2011. In a designated order on January 31, 2019 , Judge…
In a recent case,[1] the Federal District Court for the District of Maryland held that the U.S.’s federal IRS tax lien did not attach to a piece real property after the transfer to the taxpayer was voided under the Maryland Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act (“MUFCA”).[2] Facts Transfer from Insolvent Estate Plaintiff, BG, is a nursing…
In Namen v. Commissioner[1], the taxpayer was a podiatrist in private practice. He was one of 6 members of an LLC that operated a surgical center, which closed in 2009. For federal income tax purposes, the LLC was treated as a partnership. The taxpayer claimed a loss on his personal 2009 income tax return from…
Takeaway: While S corporations can be an effective means to reduce FICA taxes, the form of the arrangement must be consistent with the taxpayer’s intended reporting position(s). The S corporation, not the S corporation’s employee-shareholder, must be in control of the receipt of income in order shift income from the shareholder’s personal income tax return…
Overview In Leyh v. Commissioner[1], the Tax Court held that the taxpayer’s time incurred while traveling from her home to rental properties to perform a variety of tasks with respect to 12 rental activities counted towards the test of whether the taxpayer was a real estate professional.[2] As a result, the taxpayer was considered a…
Overview The Tax Court determined that the extinguishment of the taxpayer’s debt took place in a closed tax year, even though FEMA issued a 1099-C[1] in an open tax year. As a result, the Tax Court held that the IRS was barred by the statute of limitations from assessing the taxpayer for the federal income…
Is it possible to begin depreciating a building before the building opens its doors to customers? Although it seems unintuitive, the answer is yes. In the case of Stine LLC v. USA[1], a Louisiana federal district court held that the taxpayer’s retail building had been “placed in service” despite the fact that the retail stores…
Takeaway from Van Malssen v. Commissioner: In Van Malssen v. Commissioner, the Tax Court concluded that, for purposes of section 280A, travel days will only escape classification as personal use days if the principal purpose of the trip as a whole is to perform repairs and maintenance.[1] Overview of Facts in Van Malssen The taxpayers purchased a…
